Type 2 diabetes is a major driver of fatty liver disease and its long-term complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the individual contribution of inborn and acquired risk factors for severe liver disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes from the UK Biobank study.
A total of 22,812 UK Biobank participants of European descent without clinical history of liver disease and liver cancer were prospectively followed for the development of severe liver disease, defined as a composite diagnosis of cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and/or liver transplantation from the National Health Service records. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/CI-1040-(PD184352).html The contribution of inborn and acquired risk factors to the risk of incident severe liver disease was assessed by Cox proportional hazards models.
During a median follow-up of 8.9 years (IQR 8.1-9.6), there were 279 individuals with severe liver disease, including 255 with cirrhosis and/or decompensated liver disease, 47 with hepatocellular carcinoma, and 5 with livUK Biobank study, abnormal liver function, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria, and genetic variants in and genes are the major independent risk factors for severe liver disease. These findings may contribute in clinical care to identify and closely monitor individuals with type 2 diabetes at risk of developing severe liver disease, requiring more intensive follow-up strategies.
Type 2 diabetes is a key driver of severe liver disease, namely cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality. In Europeans with type 2 diabetes from the prospective UK Biobank study, abnormal liver function, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria, and genetic variants in PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 genes are the major independent risk factors for severe liver disease. These findings may contribute in clinical care to identify and closely monitor individuals with type 2 diabetes at risk of developing severe liver disease, requiring more intensive follow-up strategies.Endothelial injury and dysfunction play a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of infections. Endothelium-related molecules have been reported as potential diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers of infection. The prognostic value of these biomarkers in patients with cirrhosis and infections remains elusive.
In this study, we investigated the performance of key soluble endothelial injury biomarkers, including intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), von Willebrand factor (vWF), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1), and angiopoietin 1 and 2 (Ang1, 2) as mortality predictors in patients with cirrhosis and severe COVID-19 or bacterial sepsis.
A total of 66 hospitalized patients (admitted to the COVID-19 ward or liver intensive care unit [ICU]) were included. Twenty-two patients had COVID-19 alone, while 20 patients had cirrhosis plus COVID-19. Twenty-four patients had cirrhosis plus bacterial sepsis. Among patients with cirrhosis, the most common aetiology of liver disease was alcohol. In this study, we demonstrate that high plasma levels of ICAM1, an endothelial injury biomarker, is one of the important factors predicting mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients with severe COVID-19 or bacterial sepsis.
Bacterial sepsis and COVID-19 lead to increased mortality in patients with cirrhosis. In this study, we demonstrate that high plasma levels of ICAM1, an endothelial injury biomarker, is one of the important factors predicting mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients with severe COVID-19 or bacterial sepsis.Induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is almost universally complicated by febrile neutropenia(FN). Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy (EBAT) strategies advocated by guidelines result in long periods of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. We compared the outcome of AML/MDS patients treated with a 3-day versus a prolonged (until neutrophil recovery) regimen.
This is a retrospective comparative cohort study in AML or MDS patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy from 2011 to 2019, comparing 2 tertiary care hospitals with different strategies regarding antibiotic treatment for FN. At Erasmus University medical center(EMC), EBAT was stopped after 3 days of FN, in absence of a clinically or microbiologically documented infection. In the University Hospitals Leuven(UZL), a prolonged strategy was used, where EBAT was given until neutrophil recovery. The primary endpoint was a serious medical complication(SMC) defined as death or ICU admission in the 30 days after the start of chemotherapy.
305 and 270 AML or MDS patients received chemotherapy at EMC and UZL, respectively. Broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment was given for a median of 19 days (IQR13-25) at UZL versus 9 days at EMC (IQR5-13) (&lt;0?001). With the 3-day EBAT strategy, an SMC was observed in 12?5% versus 8?9% with the prolonged strategy (=0?17). The hazard ratio for an SMC was not significantly higher with the 3-day strategy (HR 1?357,95%CI 0?765-2?409).
This study suggests that during remission induction chemotherapy it is safe to stop antibiotics after 3 days of FN in absence of infection. A comparison of both strategies in a prospective trial should be pursued.
This study suggests that during remission induction chemotherapy it is safe to stop antibiotics after 3 days of FN in absence of infection. A comparison of both strategies in a prospective trial should be pursued.Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has demonstrable benefits for people living with diabetes, but the supporting evidence is almost exclusively from White individuals with type 1 diabetes. Here, we have quantified CGM profiles in Hispanic/Latino adults with or at-risk of non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes (T2D).
100 participants (79 female, 86% Hispanic/Latino [predominantly Mexican], age 54?6 [±12?0] years) stratified into (i) at risk of T2D, (ii) with pre-diabetes (pre-T2D), and (iii) with non-insulin treated T2D, wore blinded CGMs for 2 weeks. Beyond standardized CGM measures (average glucose, glucose variability, time in 70-140mg/dL and 70-180mg/dL ranges), we also examined additional CGM measures based on the time of day.
Standardized CGM measures were significantly different for participants with T2D compared to at-risk and pre-T2D participants (&lt;0?0001). In addition, pre-T2D participants spent more time between 140 and 180mg/dL during the day than at-risk participants (&lt;0?01). T2D participants spent more time between 140 and 180mg/dL both during the day and overnight compared to at-risk and pre-T2D participants (both &lt;0?0001).